Every organisation, every community, starts with a simple “why.” For centuries, the “why” of farming was survival—providing food for the family and community. Today, technology promises to make that “why” easier, but are we truly understanding the goal? We talk about precision agriculture and digital marketplaces, but are we asking the right questions about the revolution we are creating?
The old way of farming was not just a job; it was a way of life. A farmer’s expertise came from generations of shared knowledge. They knew the land, the seasons, and the subtle signs of a coming storm. But this deeply intuitive knowledge was also a shield against the complex, scientific realities of farming. A single-crop disease or a nutrient deficiency could wipe out a harvest, and the farmer had to rely on observation and gut feeling alone.
Technology offers a powerful upgrade, translating complex data into simple, actionable insights. An app that identifies a pest from a photo or a sensor that tells a farmer to water less isn’t just a tool; it’s a bridge between ancient wisdom and modern science. It elevates the farmer from a passive observer of nature to an active, informed decision-maker.
This is the promise, but it’s a promise that comes with a critical, unspoken question: What are we risking in this pursuit of efficiency?
The uncomfortable truths we need to confront
The push for technological adoption in farming is often framed as a win-win. But we must be honest about the potential for creating a new digital divide. The technology is available, but is it accessible to everyone? A farmer in a remote village without a stable internet connection or the financial means to afford a smartphone can’t participate in this revolution. We are not just creating a gap in income; we are creating a gap in knowledge, opportunity, and resilience.
If the technology is only available to those who can afford it, we risk leaving the most vulnerable farmers further behind, creating a two-tiered agricultural system—one for the digitally connected and another for the digitally excluded. This isn’t just a matter of fairness; it’s a matter of global food security. A system that leaves behind the smallholder farmers who produce a significant portion of the world’s food is inherently unstable and unsustainable.
Also Read: Indonesia’s agritech landscape: Keys to building a scalable agriculture startup
Then there’s the issue of data. Farmers are being asked to share a tremendous amount of information—from soil composition and crop health to market prices and weather patterns. This data is incredibly valuable, not just for the farmer but for the companies that provide the platforms.
The central question we must ask is: Who owns the data, and who truly benefits from it? If the farmer’s data is being collected and used to create market insights that only benefit large corporations, we are not empowering the farmer; we are simply making them a data point in a new, more efficient system of exploitation.
True empowerment means farmers must have ownership and control over their data, ensuring that the insights generated are used for their collective benefit, not just for someone else’s bottom line. This requires a fundamental shift in the business models of agri-tech companies—moving from a model that extracts value from farmers to one that shares it equitably.
Another uncomfortable truth is that technology can inadvertently erode traditional knowledge. As farmers rely more on digital tools for guidance, will they stop trusting their own intuition and the wisdom passed down through generations? Will the intimate knowledge of a particular plot of land—its history, its quirks, its unique ecosystem—be lost in a sea of generic data?
The goal isn’t to replace the farmer’s skill set but to enhance it. The most successful technology will be that which serves as a co-pilot, not a replacement. It should be a tool that helps a farmer make a better decision, not one that makes the decision for them. This requires designing technology that is intuitive and understandable, and which respects the farmer’s agency and experience.
Also Read: How Southeast Asia’s agritech startups are turning smallholder farms into high-tech powerhouses
Finally, we have to challenge the idea that profit is the only measure of success. In our pursuit of productivity and efficiency, are we losing sight of the deeper “why” of farming? A farm is a system of life, not just a factory for crops. The health of the soil, the cleanliness of the water, the well-being of the local community—these are the true indicators of a healthy agricultural system. Technology gives us the tools to measure and improve these things, but it’s up to us to decide that they are what truly matter.
The purpose of this digital transformation shouldn’t just be to make farmers a little more money; it should be to make our food systems more resilient, more sustainable, and more equitable for everyone. For instance, sensors that monitor soil moisture aren’t just about saving money on water; they’re about preserving a finite, essential resource. A transparent supply chain isn’t just about securing a better price; it’s about building trust and connection between the consumer and the person who grows their food.
The future of agriculture is not just about what technology we adopt, but about the values we embed in that technology. It’s about building a system that serves the farmer, the community, and the planet. It’s a challenge that requires us to look beyond the apps and gadgets and ask ourselves the uncomfortable questions about who we are leaving behind and what we truly want to achieve.
The digital revolution in farming has already started, but its final chapter is still unwritten. It will be up to us—tech developers, policymakers, farmers, and consumers—to decide if this powerful new era will be a story of shared prosperity or one of further division.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.
Enjoyed this read? Don’t miss out on the next insight. Join our WhatsApp channel for real-time drops.
Image courtesy: Canva Pro
The post The unspoken crisis: Are we building a new digital divide in agriculture? appeared first on e27.
